The source term
for the first- and second-generation formulation (relaxation model) of
SWAN is (Holthuijsen and de Boer, 1988):
and
represent input by wind and decay for over-developed sea states,
respectively,
and
are a linear and exponential growth term, respectively,
is the
spectral density,
is the saturated spectrum,
is a time scale and
and
are the discrete spectral wave direction and the wind direction, respectively.
The expressions for the source terms
and
have been modified for shallow water applications
(N. Booij and L.H. Holthuijsen, personal communication, 1996) and are given below.
as outlined below.
is given by an expression due to Cavaleri and Malanotte-Rizolli
(1981) as adapted by Holthuijsen and de Boer (1988) and Holthuijsen et al. (1996):
(2.159)
is a coefficient that has been tuned to be
,
is a drag coefficient equal to
and
is the fully developed peak frequency including the effect of shallow
water and is estimated from the depth dependent
relation of the Shore Protection Manual (1973):
(2.160)
(2.161)
(2.162)
is due to Snyder et al. (1981) rescaled in terms of
as
adapted by Holthuijsen and de Boer (1988) and Holthuijsen et al. (1996):
(2.163)
and
have been tuned to be
and
.
, (e.g.,
when the wind decreases), energy is dissipated with a relaxation model:
(2.164)
is a time scale given by
(2.165)
has been tuned to be
.
directional
distribution centred at the local wind direction
. It is essentially an adapted
Pierson-Moskowitz (1964) spectrum:
(2.166)
is a constant and equals
(2.167)
depends on the total dimensionless
wave energy
of the wind sea part of the spectrum and the dimensionless depth
:
(2.168)
is given by
(2.169)
(2.170)
is taken to be 0.155. This dependency of
on the local
dimensionless energy of the wind sea permits an overshoot in the wave spectrum under wave
generation conditions. For deep water
as proposed by Pierson and Moskowitz (1964).
The SWAN team 2024-09-09