First- and second-generation model formulations in SWAN
The source term for the first- and second-generation formulation (relaxation model) of
SWAN is (Holthuijsen and de Boer, 1988):
(2.158)
where and represent input by wind and decay for over-developed sea states,
respectively, and are a linear and exponential growth term, respectively, is the
spectral density, is the saturated spectrum, is a time scale and and
are the discrete spectral wave direction and the wind direction, respectively.
The expressions for the source terms and have been modified for shallow water applications
(N. Booij and L.H. Holthuijsen, personal communication, 1996) and are given below.
The distinction between first- and second-generation is only in the formulation of the
saturated spectrum as outlined below.
Linear and exponential growth
The linear growth term is given by an expression due to Cavaleri and Malanotte-Rizolli
(1981) as adapted by Holthuijsen and de Boer (1988) and Holthuijsen et al. (1996):
(2.159)
where is a coefficient that has been tuned to be ,
is a drag coefficient equal to
and
is the fully developed peak frequency including the effect of shallow
water and is estimated from the depth dependent
relation of the Shore Protection Manual (1973):
(2.160)
with the dimensionless depth
(2.161)
The Pierson-Moskowitz (1964) frequency is
(2.162)
The exponential growth term is due to Snyder et al. (1981) rescaled in terms of as
adapted by Holthuijsen and de Boer (1988) and Holthuijsen et al. (1996):
(2.163)
in which the coefficients and have been tuned to be
and
.
Decay
If the spectral densities are larger than the wind-dependent saturation spectrum , (e.g.,
when the wind decreases), energy is dissipated with a relaxation model:
(2.164)
where is a time scale given by
(2.165)
in which the coefficient has been tuned to be .
Saturated spectrum
The saturated spectrum has been formulated in term of wave number with a directional
distribution centred at the local wind direction . It is essentially an adapted
Pierson-Moskowitz (1964) spectrum:
(2.166)
For the first-generation formulation, the scale factor is a constant and equals
(2.167)
For the second-generation formulation, the scale factor depends on the total dimensionless
wave energy
of the wind sea part of the spectrum and the dimensionless depth :
(2.168)
where the total dimensionless wind sea wave energy
is given by
(2.169)
with
(2.170)
The maximum value of is taken to be 0.155. This dependency of on the local
dimensionless energy of the wind sea permits an overshoot in the wave spectrum under wave
generation conditions. For deep water
as proposed by Pierson and Moskowitz (1964).
The SWAN team 2024-09-09